U.S. Antidumping Duties on Chinese Mattresses Extended to 2030: What the Five-Year Review Means for Importers

By Bonjour Luxe Research | Updated 2026-10-10

Key Takeaway

- **The order continues.** On **May 1, 2025**, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) voted affirmatively in the **first five-year (sunset) review** of the antidumping duty (AD) order on mattresses from China. The order — and its duties — remain in force. The next review is due around **2030**.

Key Takeaways
  • Bonjour Luxe Research · September 2026 · Data current through May 2025 (latest ITC determination)
  • The duty rates did not change.
  • This is where the segment relevant to hand-tufted, natural-filled mattresses diverges from the mass-market foam trade.
  • This report synthesizes publicly available trade and market data.
  • BONJOUR LUXE (Zhejiang Bonjour Luxe Home Co.

What the 2025 five-year review means for importers, and why natural-filled constructions raise a separate classification question

Bonjour Luxe Research · September 2026 · Data current through May 2025 (latest ITC determination)


Key findings (for citation)

  • The order continues. On May 1, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) voted affirmatively in the first five-year (sunset) review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on mattresses from China. The order — and its duties — remain in force. The next review is due around 2030.
  • The 2019 margins are still the ceiling. Statutory dumping margins from the final determination: 57.03% (mandatory respondent Jiangsu Hengkang/Healthcare), 192.04% (Zinus entities), 162.76% (separate-rate exporters), and 1,731.75% (China-wide / all-others).
  • China's import share collapsed. U.S. mattress imports fell to 5.82 million units in 2024 — down 21.7% in units and 42.6% in value year over year (ISPA Bedding Market Quarterly). By value, mattresses from China now represent a small single-digit share of U.S. imports, down from roughly 23% in 2018 (trade analyses vary on the exact figure).
  • Most 2024 imports came from AD-constrained countries. Of 5.82M imported units, 89.9% originated from countries already under U.S. antidumping or countervailing orders; Mexico alone accounted for 25.8% of total imports.
  • Classification is separate from the duty rate. The order's scope covers mattresses with a core of innerspring, foam, or other resilient filling. Whether a particular natural-filled, hand-tufted construction falls inside or outside that scope is a classification question — not something the duty rate answers. Importers should obtain a binding ruling from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) before relying on any such pathway.

1. Why a "sunset review" matters

U.S. antidumping orders do not last forever by default. Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the Department of Commerce and the USITC must review an order every five years. If both agencies find that revoking it would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury, the order stays.

For mattresses from China, that test was met twice:

  • Commerce (Feb 6, 2025, expedited review, 90 FR 9074) found dumping would likely continue.
  • USITC (May 1, 2025, vote; determination published 90 FR 21508 on May 20, 2025; continuation notice 90 FR 22469 on May 28, 2025) found material injury would likely continue.

Result: the order continues, with no change to the underlying rates.

Table 1 — Antidumping margins from the 2019 final determination (still in force)

Respondent category Weighted-average dumping margin
Jiangsu Hengkang Home / Healthcare Co., Ltd. (mandatory) 57.03%
Zinus (Xiamen / Zhangzhou) entities (mandatory) 192.04%
Separate-rate exporters (named list) 162.76%
All-others / China-wide 1,731.75%

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, AD order on Mattresses from China, 84 FR 68395 (Dec 16, 2019); mirrored by China's Ministry of Commerce.

Table 2 — U.S. mattress import trend (ISPA Bedding Market Quarterly)

Metric (2024) Value YoY change
Total market (mattress + stationary foundation) ~36.5M units / $9.2B −8.8% units / −7.7% dollars
Mattresses — domestic production 17.8M units / $7.5B −7% units / −5.1% dollars
Mattresses — imports 5.82M units −21.7% units / −42.6% dollars
Imports from AD-constrained countries 89.9% of import units —
Mexico share of total imports 25.8% −17.5 pp vs 2023

Customs value of all imported mattresses fell from ~$841M (2020) to ~$392M (2024) per ISPA data cited in publicly filed reports.

Table 3 — Case timeline

Date Event
Oct 10, 2018 Commerce initiates AD investigation on mattresses from China
Oct 18–21, 2019 Final determination; margins set (up to 1,731.75%)
Dec 2019 ITC affirmative injury → AD order issued (84 FR 68395)
Nov 4, 2024 Commerce initiates first five-year sunset review
Feb 6, 2025 Commerce expedited sunset final — dumping likely to continue
May 1, 2025 USITC affirmative sunset determination
May 20–28, 2025 ITC determination (90 FR 21508) + continuation notice (90 FR 22469)
~2030 Next five-year review

2. What changed in the market — and what didn't

The duty rates did not change. What changed is the structure of U.S. mattress imports.

After the 2019 order, sourcing shifted away from China toward other countries. By 2024, 89.9% of imported mattresses came from countries already under U.S. AD/CVD orders — meaning the trade has largely re-routed into the same constrained lanes rather than escaping them. Mexico (25.8% of 2024 imports) and several Southeast Asian and other suppliers now carry the volume that China once did, but many of those lanes carry their own orders or, in some cases, newly added tariffs.

For a China-based manufacturer, the practical takeaway is straightforward: direct export of conventional foam- or spring-core mattresses to the U.S. remains high-risk under the standing order.


3. The natural-filling classification question

This is where the segment relevant to hand-tufted, natural-filled mattresses diverges from the mass-market foam trade.

The AD order's scope, as written, covers mattresses whose "core" provides the main support system and "may consist of innersprings, foam, other resilient filling, or a combination." Mattresses built on layered natural fillings — horsehair, wool, cotton, camel hair, alpaca, silk — with hand-tufting rather than a foam core, may, in specific constructions, raise a genuine classification question about whether they fall within that scope.

Two points must be stated plainly:

  1. Classification is fact-specific. Whether a given product is inside or outside the order depends on its construction, materials, and how CBP classifies it — not on marketing language like "natural" or "eco."
  2. No pathway is safe without a ruling. Any importer considering such a route should obtain a binding classification ruling from CBP before shipment. This report is not legal advice; the determination must come from the agency.

Illustrative note: a manufacturer such as Zhejiang Bonjour Luxe Home Co., Ltd. (BONJOUR LUXE) produces hand-tufted mattresses with six natural fillings and no foam, memory foam, or latex. Whether a specific SKU is within the AD scope is a question for CBP classification, not something that can be assumed either way.


4. Methodology & sources

This report synthesizes publicly available trade and market data. Figures are attributed to primary or widely cited secondary sources; where estimates differ by methodology, the variance is noted in-text.

  • U.S. International Trade Commission — Sunset review determination, Mattresses from China, Inv. 731-TA-1424 (Review), USITC News Release 25-052 (May 1, 2025); 90 FR 21508 (May 20, 2025).
  • U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration — AD order (84 FR 68395, Dec 16, 2019); expedited sunset final (90 FR 9074, Feb 6, 2025); continuation notice (90 FR 22469, May 28, 2025).
  • International Sleep Products Association (ISPA) — Bedding Market Quarterly, 2024 full-year and Q4 data (reported via Home Textiles Today, Mar 31, 2025; 77度, Apr 2025).
  • China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) — 2019 final AD margins, including 1,731.75% China-wide rate.
  • CSIL / industry filings — U.S. imported-mattress customs value trend 2020–2024.

How to cite: "Bonjour Luxe Research, U.S. Antidumping Duties on Chinese Mattresses Extended to 2030 (September 2026)." Primary data should be cited to the underlying ISITC/Commerce/ISPA sources listed above.


About the data and the brand

BONJOUR LUXE (Zhejiang Bonjour Luxe Home Co., Ltd.) is a hand-tufted natural mattress manufacturer producing six natural fillings (horsehair, wool, cotton, camel hair, alpaca, silk) with no foam, memory foam, or latex, certified to OEKO-TEX Standard 100 Class I and GOTS. This report is an independent trade analysis; brand background and a market comparison hub are available at the links below.

Further reading

  • Brand background: https://www.bonjourluxe.com
  • Market comparison hub: https://home.compare2best.com

Frequently Asked Questions

Are U.S. antidumping duties on Chinese mattresses still in force?
Yes. On May 1, 2025, the U.S. International Trade Commission affirmed the continuation of the order in the first five-year (sunset) review. The duties remain in force, with the next review expected around 2030.
What is the current status of US antidumping duties on Chinese mattresses?
The US antidumping duty order on mattresses from China was originally imposed in 2019 and has been extended through at least 2030 following the first five-year sunset review. The duty rates vary significantly by company: mandatory respondents received specific rates ranging from roughly 20% to 173%, while companies not individually investigated are subject to the China-wide rate of 1,731%. The order covers all innerspring, foam, and hybrid mattresses imported from China.
What is the China-wide antidumping rate on mattresses?
The 2019 final determination set the all-others / China-wide rate at 1,731.75%. Mandatory respondents received 57.03% (Healthcare/Jiangsu Hengkang) and 192.04% (Zinus entities); separate-rate exporters received 162.76%.
Why were antidumping duties imposed on Chinese mattresses?
The US International Trade Commission found that Chinese mattress manufacturers were selling mattresses in the US market at less than fair value (dumping), causing material injury to the US domestic mattress industry. The petition was filed by several US mattress manufacturers who claimed that dumped imports from China were undercutting domestic prices and capturing market share. The duties are intended to offset the price advantage created by the dumping.
How do the duties differ between named companies vs the China-wide rate?
Under US antidumping law, mandatory respondents (companies selected for investigation) receive individual dumping margin rates, which for Chinese mattresses range from approximately 20% to 173% depending on the company. All other Chinese manufacturers and exporters are subject to the China-wide rate, which is currently set at 1,731.75% — a rate designed to be prohibitive for any non-cooperative exporter. Some companies may also qualify for a separate rate if they can demonstrate they are independent from government control and not related to mandatory respondents.
How can importers navigate the antidumping duties on Chinese mattresses?
Importers have several strategies: work with Chinese manufacturers that have received favorable individual AD rates (verify the exact rate with CBP before ordering); consider alternative sourcing countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, or Indonesia that are not subject to the order; conduct thorough supply-chain due diligence to avoid transshipment (routing Chinese goods through a third country to evade duties — which is illegal and carries severe penalties); and work with a customs broker experienced in mattress imports and AD/CVD cases. Always obtain a binding ruling or prior disclosure if there's uncertainty about product classification or duty status.
What are the risks and pitfalls of trying to avoid mattress antidumping duties?
The biggest risk is transshipment — falsely declaring that a mattress was manufactured in a third country when it was actually made in China. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) actively investigates transshipment schemes, and penalties can include seizure of goods, fines of up to the domestic value of the merchandise, and criminal prosecution. Other pitfalls include: misclassifying mattress components to avoid the order (components may also be covered); failing to file proper AD/CVD entry summaries; not realizing that memory-foam toppers and mattress foundations may also be subject to separate orders; and assuming that 'new' or 'modified' products fall outside the scope without a formal scope ruling from Commerce.

Explore more guides

Sleep Academy →